Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958631›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Loneliness and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Dutch general population: The moderating role of psychological flexibility.

Jasper Tilburg, Marianne Simons, Tim Batink, Mayke Janssens, Sanne Peeters, Johan Lataster, Nele Jacobs, Jennifer Reijnders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jasper TilburgGGz centraal, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
Marianne SimonsFaculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Tim BatinkFaculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Mayke JanssensFaculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Sanne PeetersFaculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Johan LatasterFaculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Nele JacobsFaculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Jennifer ReijndersFaculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic found an increased risk of loneliness due to measurements taken by governments to limit social interaction. The current study addresses the relationship between loneliness and both positive and negative mental health in times of the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of psychological flexibility. Data was collected in the Dutch general population (18+) with two online questionnaires (T1-T2), with an interval of four weeks. A sample of 340 participants varying in age from 18 to 83 years (M

Indexed as

COVID-19LonelinessMental healthPsychological flexibilitySocial isolationWell-being

Identifiers

PMID39958631
PMCPMC11829098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.