Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958626›Full record

ArticleLiver research (Beijing, China)2022

Chinese expert consensus on evaluation of donor and donor liver for split liver transplantation.

Operative Surgical Group, Branch of Surgery of Chinese Medical Association;, Transplantation Group, Branch of Surgery of Chinese Medical Association

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver research (Beijing, China), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Operative Surgical Group, Branch of Surgery of Chinese Medical Association;
Transplantation Group, Branch of Surgery of Chinese Medical Association

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of the era of organ donation after citizen's death, split liver transplantation (SLT) can effectively increase the supply of donor livers and shorten the transplantation wait time for patients, especially pediatric recipients. In recent years, SLT has been performed to varying degrees in many transplant centers in China, and varying levels of efficacy have been achieved. The quality of donors and donor livers for SLT is an important factor affecting the outcome of the surgery. At this stage, it is necessary to reach a consensus on the evaluation of SLT donor and liver donor that is suitable for the conditions in China by combining the well-established experience of the international community with advanced transplantation technology. This approach will aid in enhancing the efficacy of SLT. Based on the experience of experts, a consensus on the evaluation of donors and donor livers for SLT has been formulated in this study, which focuses on evaluation of donors and donor livers, evaluating the functional and anatomical aspects of the donor liver and donor-recipient matching.

Indexed as

Anatomical variationBody mass index (BMI)EvaluationGraft recipient weight ratioGuidelinesHepatic steatosisOrgan donation after citizen's deathSplit liver transplantation (SLT)

Identifiers

PMID39958626
PMCPMC11791791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.