ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Identification of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who might benefit from third-line chemotherapy.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Survival outcomes and prognostic value of nutritional and inflammatory markers in third-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurvival rates of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) have been improved with palliative chemotherapy series. The current preferred first-line regimen consists of combination therapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) or gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel (GNP). After failure of first-line chemotherapy, there are a few options for subsequent therapy including switch to the unused first-line regimen or nano-liposomal irinotecan and 5-FU/LV. However, there are limited studies on the efficacy of third-line chemotherapy after failure of second-line chemotherapy.
aimTo identify patients with APC who might benefit from third-line chemotherapy.
methodsMedical records from a single tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed between 2012 and 2021. The study included patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or locally APC who underwent first-line FOLFIRINOX or GNP and subsequently received third-line chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) after diagnosis and OS after third-line chemotherapy (OS3) were defined as the interval from the diagnosis to all-cause death and the time between the initiation of the third-line chemotherapy to all-cause death, respectively.
resultsA total of 141 patients were enrolled. The median patient age at diagnosis was 61.8 years (36.0-86.0), and 54.9% were male. The first-line regimen was FOLFIRINOX (67.4%) or GNP (32.6%). The second-line regimen was FOLFIRINOX (27.0%), GNP (52.5%), or other (20.6%). The median OS was 19.0 months, and the median OS3 and progression-free survival after third-line treatment were 15.3 and 7.3 weeks, respectively. With regard to the best tumor response during third-line chemotherapy, 1.4% had partial response, 24.8% had stable disease, and 59.6% had progressive disease. The following clinical factors before third-line chemotherapy affected OS3: Good performance status (PS), serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level < 1000 U/mL, duration of second-line chemotherapy ≥ 19 weeks, and no peritoneal seeding.
conclusionThis study identified that patients with good PS, CA19-9 < 1000 U/mL, second-line chemotherapy ≥ 19 weeks, and no peritoneal seeding before starting third-line treatment may benefit more from third-line chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.