ArticleNeurosurgery practice2025
Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Double Reimplantation Bypass for Treatment of a Dolichoectatic Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysm: A Technical Report.
Article in Neurosurgery practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and importanceThe surgical management of posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms often poses a challenge because of tight surgical corridors, proximity to the lower cranial nerves, and the presence of perforators supplying the medulla. This report describes an excision and double reimplantation bypass for treatment of a dolichoectatic PICA aneurysm found on familial screening in a young man with a family history of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: The patient underwent a right far-lateral craniotomy with excision of the dolichoectatic right PICA aneurysm with an additional outflow branch. An end-to-end reanastomosis was performed from the proximal PICA to the larger distal outflow PICA vessel, followed by an end-to-side anastomosis of the second outflow branch to the distal PICA; a salvage bypass with side-to-side V4-p2 reimplantation was later conducted because of thrombus formation at the initial end-to-end reanastomosis.
conclusionPICA aneurysms are uncommon and difficult to treat because of their location and complex anatomy, often requiring unique bypass techniques. This case was further complicated by a thrombus formation, which was likely caused by pathological aneurysmal tissue being incorporated in the bypass. This case required an unconventional bypass construct that proved to be effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.