ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2024
Development of a New Instrument to Measure Workplace Mental Health and Well-Being.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and pilot test a new instrument measuring workplace mental health and well-being among health professionals. Participants and Methods: A new survey instrument (hereafter referred to as the Results: The survey's response rate was 97.8% (583 responses out of 596 surveyed). Physicians comprised the largest health professional group surveyed (307, 52.7%), followed by advanced practice nurses (207, 35.5%), and physician assistants (69, 11.8%). The domain-specific Cronbach's α ranged from 0.71 (0.67-0.75) to 0.90 (0.87-0.92), whereas the overall scale α was 0.94 (0.93-0.95), suggesting strong reliability. The Ω (high-order) score was 0.91, confirming that all items measured the latent construct. The convergent validity analysis confirmed the inverse relationship between total scale score and perception of burnout. Conclusion: To our knowledge, the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.