Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958445›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025

Reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy: The dilemma and the options.

Priya Hazrah

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07620899 (Randomized Controlled Trial of Structured Biological Optimization Versus Standard Care With Embedded Prospective Registry in Post-POEM Achalasia Cardia Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07620899 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial of Structured Biological Optimization Versus Standard Care With Embedded Prospective Registry in Post-POEM Achalasia Cardia Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaRan2026 to 2028Enrolled166ConditionsAchalasia Cardia, GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease)ArmsStructured Biological Optimization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Priya HazrahDepartment of Surgery, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi 110001, Delhi, India. priyahazrah@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is rapidly emerging as the treatment of choice for achalasia cardia, but its success is marred by problematic reflux. Although symptomatic reflux rates are low and often comparable to that after laparoscopic Hellers myotomy (LHM), a high incidence of pathologic reflux has been noted after POEM. This poses a dilemma as to what is true reflux, and in determining the indications and optimal endpoints for managing post-POEM reflux. The two pertinent reasons for the difference in reflux rates between LHM and POEM are the variation in length and location of myotomy and the absence of an anti-reflux procedure in POEM. Proton pump inhibitor remains the most sought-after treatment of POEM derived reflux. Nevertheless, modifications in the procedural technique of POEM and the addition of endoscopic fundoplication can probably emerge as a game changer. This article briefly reviews the incidence, causes, controversies, predictive factors, and management strategies related to post-POEM reflux.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaGastroesophageal RefluxHeller MyotomyNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryPostoperative ComplicationsPyloromyotomyEsophageal Sphincter, LowerFundoplicationHumansIncidenceProton Pump InhibitorsRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeProton Pump InhibitorsAchalasiaEndoluminal functional lumen imaging planimetry tailored myotomyEndoscopic fundoplicationGastroesophageal reflux diseaseLaparoscopic Heller myotomyPathologic refluxPer oral endoscopic myotomyProton pump inhibitorSling-fiber preserving myotomyTransoral incisionless fundoplication

Identifiers

PMID39958445
PMCPMC11752699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.