Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958439›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2025

Innovative approaches in predicting outcomes for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.

Mahmoud Nassar, Bahaaeldin Baraka, Andrew H Talal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahmoud NassarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14221, United States.
Bahaaeldin BarakaMedical Oncologist, Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, United Kingdom.
Andrew H TalalDepartment of Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms pose significant challenges due to their varied presentations and prognoses. Traditional prognostic models, while useful, often fall short of accurately predicting clinical outcomes for these patients. This article discusses the development and implications of a novel prognostic tool, the GATIS score, which aims to enhance predictive accuracy and guide treatment strategies more effectively than current methods. Utilizing data from a large cohort and employing sophisticated statistical models, the GATIS score integrates clinical and pathological markers to provide a nuanced assessment of prognosis. We evaluate the potential of this score to transform clinical decision-making processes, its integration into current medical practices, and future directions for its development. The integration of genetic markers and other biomarkers could further refine its predictive power, highlighting the ongoing need for innovation in the management of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsRectal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorClinical Decision-MakingHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRectumTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersGATIS scoreNeuroendocrine carcinomaPrognostic assessmentRectal neuroendocrine neoplasmsRectal neuroendocrine tumorsSurvival predictionTumor staging

Identifiers

PMID39958439
PMCPMC11752703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.