Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958395›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical education2025

Is This a Helpful YouTube Video? A Research-Based Framework for Evaluating and Developing Conceptual Chemistry Instructional Videos.

Deborah G Herrington, Ryan D Sweeder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deborah G HerringtonChemistry Department, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan 49401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6682-8466
Ryan D SweederLyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48825, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5488-4927

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of sites such as YouTube has allowed learners to access videos to support their classroom learning. Given the varying quality and content of chemistry instructional videos, identifying and selecting appropriate videos can be challenging for both instructors and students. This article aims to summarize education research important for creating videos to support students' conceptual chemistry learning and identify ways these criteria can be operationalized for use in the framework to evaluate or guide the development of instructional videos focused on conceptual understanding of chemistry topics. The framework helps the user consider the chemistry content of the video through the lenses of the disciplinary Core Ideas, Science Practices, causal mechanistic reasoning, and Johnstone's Triangle. It also includes design considerations from Mayer's multimedia theory and considerations for accessibility. Finally, we summarize findings and insights gained from using the framework to evaluate a set of 25 highly viewed or highly relevant YouTube videos related to Le Chatelier's Principle.

Identifiers

PMID39958395
PMCPMC11823403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.