Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958287›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Impact of laparoscopic surgeries on optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in children.

Mohsina Yasmeen, Sumaiya Sabreen, Akshay Bettanayaka, Saraswathi Nagappa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohsina YasmeenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sumaiya SabreenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Akshay BettanayakaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Saraswathi NagappaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgeries elevates intracranial ICP because of the increased abdominal pressure, and ICP increases even further in the Trendelenburg position. A new noninvasive method to measure optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) via ultrasonography detects the raised ICP is reliable and inexpensive and can be repeated many times. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 23 pediatric patients aged between 5 and 16 years, undergoing elective laparoscopic procedures under general anesthesia, were included. After endotracheal intubation with proper aseptic precautions, ocular ultrasound was performed to measure baseline ONSD in both eyes. Later, pneumoperitoneum was established by maintaining the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) at 12 cmH2O. Again, ONSD was estimated at 15 minutes of pneumoperitoneum and observed for any variation from the previous readings. The cutoff considered for ONSD was 5 mm, above which the intracranial pressure (ICP) was regarded as increased. Results: In our study, the mean age of subjects was 9.67 ± 5.18 years. The majority were males (60.9%). The subjects showed an increase in ONSD at the 15 Conclusion: USG-guided ONSD measurements serve as a valuable tool in ensuring optimal intra-abdominal pressures and safe administration of anesthesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, particularly those vulnerable to an increase in ICP.

Indexed as

Intracranial pressureoptic nervepneumoperitoneum

Identifiers

PMID39958287
PMCPMC11829697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.