ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
Proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation in lower abdominal gynecological surgeries for perioperative gastric volume assessment and assessing postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal functions: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the context of perioperative care, the concern of gastric content aspiration during surgical procedures is crucial, though relatively rare. Supraglottic devices after the creation of pneumoperitoneum and positive pressure ventilation may cause gastric insufflation. This study explores the unique aspects of antral cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement as a novel indicator in comparing the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal intubation in airway management during lower abdominal surgeries and assessing postoperative recovery in both the groups. Methods: The study commenced after obtaining approval from Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC number-AIIMS/IEC/22/251 Date: 27/05/2022) and after registration in Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) (CTRI/2022/07/044102 Registered on: 18/07/2022) and was conducted from August 2022 to August 2023. A total of 72 ASA I and II participants were included in two groups: endotracheal tube (ETT) (Group E) and PLMA (Group P). The primary outcome was the antral CSA, and secondary outcomes included hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, time to start clear fluid, light diet, and length of stay. Results: Our results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in antral CSA at various time intervals. The hemodynamic variables were significantly higher in the endotracheal tube group ( Conclusions: Patients who underwent minimally invasive lower abdominal surgeries, choice of airway management technique, whether ETT or PLMA, did not substantially impact antral CSA, vital parameters, respiratory parameters, or postoperative recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.