Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958258›Full record

ReviewBJUI compass2025

Expert consensus on Rezūm™: Indications, surgical technique and postoperative care.

Emilio López Alcina, Manuel Fernández Arjona, Ester Fernández Guzmán, Jorge Rioja Zuazu, Iván Schwartzman Jochamowitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Real-world comparison of RezūmWorld journal of urology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emilio López AlcinaHead of Service at the General University Hospital of Valencia Valencia Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7377-6331
Manuel Fernández ArjonaHead of the Urology Department at University Hospital of Henares Madrid Spain.
Ester Fernández GuzmánAssistant of the Urology Service of the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital Santander Spain.
Jorge Rioja ZuazuUrology Specialist at Miguel Servet Hospital Zaragoza Spain.
Iván Schwartzman JochamowitzBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Reconstructive Urology Unit at the Fundació Puigvert Barcelona Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lower urinary tract symptoms associated to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) is a growing condition in males associated to a high clinical, economic and humanistic burden. Currently, there is a wide range of therapeutic options, both pharmacological and surgical. In recent years, several minimally invasive therapies have emerged, but they still have limitations. In this context, water vapour thermal therapy (WVTT), Rezüm™, is a new minimally invasive surgical technique with a low retreatment rate and the ability to preserve sexual function. The objective of this study is to establish recommendations for the correct execution of WVTT, as well as to define the ideal patient profile for the intervention. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, without date limitations, using the terms 'benign prostatic hyperplasia', 'benign prostatic enlargement', 'prostatic hyperplasia', 'bph', 'Rezūm', 'water vapour thermal therapy', 'quality of life' and 'HRQOL'. A systematic review of the evidence was conducted and subsequently discussed in a face-to-face meeting with a panel of five experts in the field of urology. The aspects addressed were classified into patient profile, pre-intervention, intervention and post-intervention. Results: The search returned 172 results, ultimately leading to the analysis of 49 articles. Evidence and expert opinion showed that WVTT could be a good option for patients with moderate to severe symptomatology, no age restriction, Qmax <15 mL/s and prostate volume greater than 30 cm Conclusions: WVTT is considered a safe treatment option, even as a first-line approach for certain patient profiles. However, further research is needed in areas where evidence and clinical experience remain limited, including postoperative catheter management, anaesthesia, antibiotic prophylaxis and follow-up care for patients after the procedure.

Indexed as

benign prostatic hyperplasialower urinary tract symptomsminimally invasive surgical treatmentprostatewater vapour thermal therapy

Identifiers

PMID39958258
PMCPMC11829116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.