ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Do preheated composite resins provide better cementation results for indirect restorations? A Systematic Review.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preheated Composite for Prosthetic Cementation to Enamel and Dentin: A Scoping Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The article addresses the use of preheated composite resins as cementation agents in indirect restorations, highlighting the importance of these materials in the adhesion between the restoration and the dental substrate. Cementation agents are crucial for the overall strength of restorations, and research indicates that resins with higher inorganic filler content may enhance the strength of ceramic restorations. Material and Methods: The study was conducted as a systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, and analyzed bond strength, physicochemical properties, and color variations. After a search in various databases, nine studies were included in the analysis. Results: The results suggest that while preheated composites may have some advantages, their mechanical properties and the thickness of the cementation layer are not superior to those of traditional resin cements. Conclusions: The article concludes that the adoption of these composites as cementation agents results in modest improvements, and caution is needed when considering their clinical application.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.