ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
The effect of replacing dental needles between subsequent inferior alveolar nerve blocks on pain and trismus - a double blinded, randomised split-mouth study.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of Dental Needle Bevel Deformation: Gauge, Insertion Frequency, and Length as Key Determinants.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inferior alveolar Nerve Blocks are widely used in dental practice for achieving anaesthesia in the mandibular teeth. It is widely accepted that in order for this type of injection to be effective, the needle needs to penetrate a substantial depth of soft tissues as well as make contact with bone. This routinely leads to both blunting and barbing of the needle tip suggesting that a needle change is preferable for any subsequent injection as this will result in less tissue damage and pain for patient's. The study aimed to verify whether a change in needle affected measures of pain and trismus. Material and Methods: This was a prospective, single center, double blinded (both clinician and participant), randomized, split-mouth study conducted in a large dental hospital and teaching facility. Participants were screened for factors that might alter their head pain sensation and participated in 2 clinical visits. In the first visit 2 needle insertions either with/without needle change were performed without anaesthetic as per an IANB injection. A survey instrument was used to capture several dimensions of pain both immediately after the visit as well as 48-72 hours later. This method was repeated on a second visit on the opposite mandibular quadrant after a washout period of at least 2 weeks. Paired t-Test's were performed at the 2 time points. Results: Significance was only demonstrated in one of 10 sensory and 12 emotional pain descriptors during one of the 2 time points of measurement. Similarly, VAS mean pain scores and a measure of trismus were not affected by needle change. Conclusions: This study was able to demonstrate that a change in needle between subsequent IANB's does not affect self-reported measures of pain nor trismus.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.