ReviewVeterinary oncology (London, England)2025
Comparative oncology in action: vignettes on immunotherapy development.
Review in Veterinary oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) into Preclinical Regulatory Evaluation of Oncology Drugs.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Insights from veterinary models for advancing oncolytic virotherapy through comparative oncology.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- The role of regulatory T cells in central nervous system diseases in dogs: fighting with a double-edged sword toward translational discoveries.American journal of translational research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunotherapeutic approaches to cancer treatment have gained significant traction in recent years, due in large part to the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors and T cell-based therapies. Comparative oncology is the study of naturally-occurring cancer in companion (pet) animals, mainly dogs, and is a powerful tool in cancer research and drug development. Given their intact, educated immune systems and natural co-evolution of tumor, microenvironment and stromal components, tumor-bearing pet dogs are an attractive species in which to explore these cellular interactions and test novel therapeutic approaches. Moreover, similarities between the canine and human immune systems support assessment of a wide variety of approaches, including antagonistic or agonistic antibodies directed at specific cellular targets, tumor vaccines, cell-based therapies, and combinations of these with conventional cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This manuscript provides specific examples of how canine immunotherapeutic studies informed an approach destined for human use, with an emphasis on study design, correlative immune assay development and application, and definition of biologic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.