ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Intraoperative longitude-latitude-depth three-dimensional localization of pulmonary nodules.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07675889 (Intraoperative Longitude-Latitude-Depth Three-Dimensional Localization Versus Preoperative CT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Puncture Localization for the Treatment of 0.8-2 cm Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intraoperative Longitude-Latitude-Depth Three-Dimensional Localization Versus Preoperative CT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Puncture Localization for the Treatment of 0.8-2 cm Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative and intraoperative localization of small pulmonary nodules for thoracoscopic surgery: a contemporary narrative review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Robotic-assisted bronchoscopic localization for small pulmonary nodules: a novel approach to minimally invasive surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Identifying small pulmonary nodules during sublobar resection via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) poses certain challenges. Although preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided localization is common, it is invasive and may lead to complications. This study aims to develop a novel, non-invasive technique for improving the accuracy of pulmonary nodule localization during VATS, with the goal of reducing complications associated with traditional methods. Methods: We developed the longitude-latitude-depth (LLD) localization method, a novel intraoperative approach for localizing small pulmonary nodules. The LLD method uses anatomical reference points derived from the lung's natural structure to guide nodule localization during surgery. This retrospective study compared patients with small pulmonary nodules (≤2 cm in diameter, consolidation tumor ratio ≤0.5, and outer one-third of the pulmonary parenchyma) undergoing either intraoperative LLD localization or preoperative CT-guided hook-and-wire localization followed by VATS at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from March 2020 to November 2023. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to the compare clinical information and perioperative outcomes, with 176 patients in each group after matching was performed. Results: Compared to the CT-guided localization, the LLD method achieved higher accuracy (96.59%) during surgery and had a significantly reduced localization duration (5 Conclusions: LLD localization is noninvasive, time-saving, and cost-effective and may be a feasible, safe, and effective technique for localizing small pulmonary nodules during surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.