ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rare tongue base metastasis from SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated non-small cell lung carcinoma: a case report.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic misalignment averted by clonal evolutionary evidence: molecular confirmation of hepatic metastasis in SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancer initially misdiagnosed as resectable cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- CT imaging features of pulmonary SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated carcinoma: a retrospective case series.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The role of SMARCA4 in lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Review
- Case Report: NUTM1-rearranged lung sarcoma: a rare case imaged with dynamic and staticFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Case Report: Prognostic evaluation of immunotherapy in two patients with SMARCA4-UT using TCR as a new marker.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: Our analysis included 23 patients with pathologically confirmed S/B-d NSCLC from January 2021 to December 2023. A retrospective analysis of clinical, serum tumor markers, imaging [including CT, FDG PET/CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)], pathological features, treatment protocols, and follow-up results was performed. Independent samples Results: S/B-d NSCLC occurs predominantly in male patients with a history of smoking and a mean age of 62.78 years (39-77 years). S/B-d NSCLC was found incidentally during physical examination in 56.52% of patients. The CT scan features were as follows: predominantly tumors (72.73%), peripheral in the lungs (77.27%), round or roundish morphology (81.28%), pleural or vascular invasion (95.46%), and moderately to severely enhanced (59.09%). The FDG PET/CT showed FDG-avid with mean SUV Conclusions: S/B-d NSCLC has distinct features in epidemiology, serum tumor markers, imaging, and pathology. In particular, FDG-avid is evident in the FDG PET/CT scan. The size of the lesion and the degree of FDG avidity provide information about the degree of malignancy and the high probability of distant metastasis in S/B-d NSCLC. FDG PET/CT is recommended when S/B-d NSCLC is suspected based on CT features, especially for large lesions. The FDG PET/CT scan can help with accurate staging and individual treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.