Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958206›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025

Association between immunotherapy timing and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive analysis at a high-volume specialist centre.

Igor Gomez-Randulfe, Mark Pearce, Daniel Netto, Rebecca Ward, Raffaele Califano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Igor Gomez-RandulfeDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Mark PearceDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Daniel NettoDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Rebecca WardDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Raffaele CalifanoDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The timing of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration may influence clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Previous studies have shown varying effects of chronotherapy on survival rates, with some suggesting that a higher percentage of doses administered in the morning improves overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the timing of the first dose and the percentage of doses administered in the afternoon on survival outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients, as well as explore seasonal variations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary cancer centre of patients diagnosed with NSCLC and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50% who received first-line palliative treatment with pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. Patients were categorized based on the timing of their first dose (before or after 14:30) and further stratified by the percentage of doses received after 14:30. To evaluate seasonal variance, patients were also stratified into two groups: those who received their first dose within three months before or after the winter solstice ("Winter group") and those who received it within three months before or after the summer solstice ("Summer group"). Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified 349 patients who met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in PFS or OS between patients receiving their first ICI dose before 14:30 (n=188) and those receiving it after 14:30 (n=161). However, a significant difference in OS was observed in patients who received more than 50% of their doses in the afternoon. Seasonal variations in dosing timing did not significantly impact survival outcomes. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the timing of the first ICI dose does not significantly affect survival outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients. However, patients receiving a higher percentage of their doses in the afternoon may experience poorer OS. Further prospective research is needed to confirm these findings and understand the underlying mechanisms before any changes to clinical practice can be recommended.

Indexed as

Chronotherapyimmunotherapynon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)pembrolizumabtime-of-the-day

Identifiers

PMID39958206
PMCPMC11826263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.