ArticleLiver research (Beijing, China)2022
Exhaled volatile organic compounds for cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis.
Article in Liver research (Beijing, China), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning-enabled diagnosis of viral respiratory infections from exhaled volatile organic compound analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The difficulties in the early detection consequent to the lack of sensitive biomarkers render patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) to have poor outcomes. Recently, sensitive and specific volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were identified in several cancers. However, the VOC profiles in CCA are not well-studied. Thus, we investigated the VOC profiles in exhaled breath of CCA patients and controls. Methods: We prospectively collected exhaled breath samples from 30 consecutive patients newly diagnosed with CCA and 30 controls who did not have CCA (seven had benign biliary strictures and 23 had other medical conditions). Exhaled VOCs were identified using gas chromatography mass spectrometry Triple Quadrupoles system. Analysis of the significant differences in VOCs between cases and controls was conducted using supervised multivariate regression analysis. Further validation was performed for these VOCs in another cohort of 18 CCA patients and 22 controls. Results: Levels of six compounds were significantly different between CCA patients and controls, namely, acetone, isopropyl alcohol, dimethyl sulfide, 1,4-pentadiene, allyl methyl sulfide, and Conclusion: Breath analysis may potentially be useful for CCA diagnosis. A cohort of patients with early-stage CCA in further studies is needed to confirm the ability of exhaled VOCs for the early detection of CCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.