ArticleCureus2025
Pelvic Diameters and Their Association With Maternal Body Mass Index, Parity, and Delivery Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between iron supplementation during pregnancy and delivery mode on double burden of malnutrition in South Asia: A cross-sectional survey study.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background In addition to age, body mass index (BMI), abdominal circumference, and parity, measuring the mother's pelvic diameters is a non-invasive, cost-effective method that can assist gynecologists in determining the optimal management of labor. Our study aimed to examine the associations between maternal age, pelvic diameters, BMI, abdominal circumference, and parity with delivery outcomes and investigate differences in pelvic diameters in relation to maternal age, BMI, delivery outcomes, parity, and episiotomy. Materials and methods The observational, cross-sectional study included 108 pregnant women in the active phase of labor who were admitted to the Gynecological Clinic at the Clinical Center University of Sarajevo. During admission, maternal data were registered: age, body height, body weight, abdominal circumference, and BMI. Using a pelvinometer, pelvic diameters were recorded: interspinous diameter (DS), intertrochanteric diameter (DT), intercristal diameter (DC), and external conjugate (CE). The Anterior Pelvic Index (API) was calculated by dividing the DS by the participants' height and multiplying the result by 100. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17 (Released 2008; SPSS Inc., Chicago, United States). Results Women who underwent cesarean section were significantly older compared to those with spontaneous vaginal delivery. A significant correlation was observed between maternal age, BMI, and delivery outcomes. Obese women had significantly higher DT compared to women with normal or overweight BMI. Primiparous and multiparous women differed significantly in CE, while other pelvic diameters did not differ. Women with episiotomy had significantly lower DS and CE diameters compared to those without episiotomy during vaginal delivery. Conclusion Maternal age, BMI, and pelvic diameters are significant delivery outcome determinants; our findings suggest that these parameters deserve to be included in delivery outcome assessment as they provide substantial information in the journey of achieving personalized delivery care and decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.