Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958119›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Clinical and Microbiological Spectrum of Dermatophytosis From a Tertiary Care Institute.

Sukanya Sudhaharan, Dipika Shaw, Sabaa Naaz, Savitha Kovida, Umabala Pamidimukkala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sukanya SudhaharanMicrobiology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.
Dipika ShawMicrobiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Sabaa NaazMicrobiology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.
Savitha KovidaMicrobiology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.
Umabala PamidimukkalaMicrobiology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction There is an increasing incidence of recalcitrant dermatophytosis in India due to the irrational use of antifungals, inappropriate treatment, and in vitro resistance of the organism. The study aims to determine the clinic-mycological profile, antifungal susceptibility, and outcome of patients with dermatophytosis in our institute. Methods This was a retrospective observational study from January 2019 to December 2019. Detailed clinical data of all the enrolled patients were collected. Identification of the dermatophytes was performed by colony morphology and microscopy. Further, the preserved isolates were sent to the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh for confirmation of identification and antifungal susceptibility testing. Results Of the 155 clinical suspected cases, growth of dermatophytes was observed in 55 (35.4%) of the cases. Tinea corporis (39/55, 70.9%) was the predominant clinical type. The duration of infection was less than six months in 22/55 (40%) of cases. Most patients were in the age group of 20-30 years. Diabetes mellitus was the predominant comorbid condition in 7/55 (12.7%) patients. Previous therapy with topical and systemic antifungals was given in 32/55 (58.8%) of the patients.

Indexed as

chronic dermatophytosisresistanceterbinafinetineatrichophyton

Identifiers

PMID39958119
PMCPMC11829238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.