Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958112›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Analysis of Sensory Recovery of Neurotized Free Flaps in Cases of Head-Neck Reconstruction: Our Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Aparajita Saha, Jiten K Mishra, Shamendra A Sahu, Moumita De, Abi Sindhuja, Nikita Birua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aparajita SahaBurns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Raipur, IND.
Jiten K MishraBurns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Raipur, IND.
Shamendra A SahuBurns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Raipur, IND.
Moumita DeBurns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Raipur, IND.
Abi SindhujaBurns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Raipur, IND.
Nikita BiruaBurns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Raipur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional outcomes have been better concerning swallowing ability, distinguishing hot and cold sensations, articulation, and improved range of tongue movement by sensory neurotization of the flaps used for head and neck reconstruction. We evaluated the sensory recovery in free flaps utilizing the great auricular nerve as the recipient sensory nerve, anastomosing a few fascicles of the greater auricular nerve (GAN) to that of the flap sensory nerve; lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve in the radial forearm free flap, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in the anterolateral thigh flap. The sensory examination was performed at the visible center of the flap at the three-month and six-month follow-ups. The flaps were assessed for the recovery of five sensory modalities: fine touch, pain, pressure, two-point discrimination (2PD), and temperature. The sensory recovery was evaluated according to the Mackinnon Dellon scale. The sensory recovery in the neurotized flaps was compared with that in non-neurotized free flaps at the six-month follow-up. The sensory recovery graded by the Mackinon Dellon scale for all five modalities of sensation was statistically significant in sensate-free flaps at the six-month follow-up. Also, the sensory territory of the greater auricular nerve at the peri-auricular area was assessed for loss of sensation at the six-month follow-up, which was not clinically significant. We observed the great auricular nerve as a potential sensory nerve that may be utilized at the flap reconstruction site to neurotize free flaps used for head and neck reconstruction with a significant sensory recovery and without worrisome symptoms at the GAN sensory territory.

Indexed as

ganlabcneurotisationneurotised free flapsensory recovery in head and neck reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID39958112
PMCPMC11830379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.