Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958081›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Clinicopathological Analysis of Ovarian Neoplasms at a Tertiary Care Teaching Institute of North Malabar: A Four-Year Retrospective Study.

Janaky Ramakrishnan, Mary Nandini Singh, Benzy Paul, Sathi Puthen Parambath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janaky RamakrishnanPathology, Kunhitharuvai Memorial Charitable Trust (KMCT) Medical College, Kozhikode, IND.
Mary Nandini SinghPathology, Kunhitharuvai Memorial Charitable Trust (KMCT) Medical College, Kozhikode, IND.
Benzy PaulPathology, Kunhitharuvai Memorial Charitable Trust (KMCT) Medical College, Kozhikode, IND.
Sathi Puthen ParambathPathology, Kunhitharuvai Memorial Charitable Trust (KMCT) Medical College, Kozhikode, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Ovarian neoplasms represent a significant risk to women's health worldwide. Approximately 90% of ovarian neoplasms are of epithelial origin, representing the predominant category and comprising many subtypes, such as mucinous and serous. The incidence of ovarian cancer increases with age. Serous carcinoma, the predominant ovarian cancer observed in older individuals, is associated with a poor prognosis. A precise histopathological diagnosis is essential for successful management and therapy planning, as the histological subtype influences treatment modalities and prognostic outcomes. Aim This study aimed to determine the clinical symptomatology, age distribution, tumor laterality, gross appearance, and histopathological spectrum of ovarian tumors. Materials and methods This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care center in the Malabar region of North Kerala. All ovarian neoplasms received in the department of pathology as part of the diagnostic work-up from September 2019 to September 2023 were taken for analysis. Gross and microscopic features of resection specimens, along with relevant clinical data, were reviewed and analyzed from previous records. The ovarian neoplasms were categorized according to the latest WHO classification. Results The total sample size for ovarian neoplasms was 455. The age range was from 11 to 80 years. The predominant presenting complaint was abdominal pain (28%, n=128), followed by pelvic discomfort (16%, n=75). Surface epithelial ovarian tumors represented the predominant histological subtype with 329 (72%) cases, while the germ cell tumor category comprised 84 (19%) cases, followed by sex cord-stromal tumors with 24 (5%), mixed ovarian tumors with 11 (2%), and miscellaneous tumors with 7 (2%) cases. The majority of tumors in the surface epithelial (n=329) category were benign cystadenomas/cystadenofibromas, with 291 (88.4%) cases, while borderline and malignant epithelial tumors constituted 9 (2.8%) and 29 (8.8%) cases, respectively. The most common benign ovarian neoplasm was serous cystadenoma, with 208 (45.7%) cases, followed by mature cystic teratoma with 80 (17.6%) cases. The most common malignant tumor was serous carcinoma, with 15 (3.3%) cases. Metastasis of the ovary was seen in four cases, one of which was a bilateral ovarian metastasis from a uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma. We also encountered a rare case of small cell carcinoma of the ovary in a 26-year-old woman. Conclusion Ovarian tumors encompass a wide spectrum of neoplasms ranging from benign to highly malignant lesions, presenting significant diagnostic and management challenges. While benign tumors like serous cystadenomas often cause minimal morbidity and are readily treated surgically, malignant ovarian tumors, including high-grade serous carcinoma, are associated with a grave prognosis due to their often delayed diagnosis and aggressive nature. Early detection remains paramount to reducing the high morbidity and mortality associated with ovarian malignancies.

Indexed as

borderline tumoursovarian neoplasmsserous carcinomasex cordteratoma

Identifiers

PMID39958081
PMCPMC11830128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.