Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958069›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Systematic Review of Tibial Stems in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Prabu Supramaniam, Arshad Barmare, Siva Chandrasekaran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Prabu SupramaniamOrthopaedics, Kuala Lumpur Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Arshad BarmareOrthopaedics, Werribee Mercy Hospital, Werribee, AUS.
Siva ChandrasekaranOrthopedic Surgery, St. Vincent's Private Hospital, Werribee, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tibial stems are increasingly used in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to enhance stability and reduce component load, particularly in complex cases involving obesity, severe deformity, bone loss, and inflammatory arthritis. However, limited literature exists on their indications, outcomes, and complications. This study systematically reviews the indications for tibial stems in primary TKA, the types of stems used, and their associated outcomes, including revision rates and complications. A systematic review, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to January 2024. Studies comparing stemmed and non-stemmed tibial baseplates, as well as those not comparing with non-stemmed tibial baseplates, were included. Abstracts, commentaries, and case reports were excluded. Twenty-three studies, comprising 2,073 tibial stems (30-145 mm), met the inclusion criteria. The primary indication for tibial stems was in obese patients, with variable body mass index (BMI) thresholds. The use of tibial stems, particularly short cemented stems, demonstrated favorable outcomes in complex primary TKA, including reduced rates of aseptic loosening and improved functional scores. In cases of severe varus deformity and osteoarthritis with associated tibial stress or plateau fractures, tibial stems were effective in reducing complications and improving implant stability. Short cemented tibial stems benefit complex primary TKA, especially in obese patients and those with severe deformities, preserving bone stock, optimizing load transmission, and minimizing complications. Further research is needed to establish standardized guidelines for optimal tibial stem use in primary TKA.

Indexed as

aseptic looseningprimary knee arthroplastysystematic reviewtibial stem extensiontotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39958069
PMCPMC11830113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.