ArticleCureus2025
Impact of Imaging on Surgical Management of Penetrating Chest Trauma: Experience From a High-Volume Trauma Center in a Resource-Constrained Environment.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Self-limiting penetrating cardiothoracic injury from a barbed shark dart involving the right atrium.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Penetrating chest trauma is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, with the need for accurate and timely diagnosis being crucial in determining appropriate management. This study aims to evaluate the role of computed tomography (CT) imaging in the assessment and surgical management of patients with penetrating chest trauma at a high-volume trauma center in a developing country. Objective To assess the contribution of CT imaging in the evaluation and surgical management of patients presenting with penetrating chest trauma at a resource-limited trauma center in Pakistan. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Thoracic Surgery and Radiology Departments of Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from January 2024 to June 2024. A convenient sampling technique was used to include 139 patients with penetrating chest trauma. Demographic details, trauma complications, fractures, and management strategies were recorded. Thick-slice, non-contrast, chest CT scans were performed and reviewed by a consultant radiologist. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results The study included 139 patients with a mean age of 26.7 ± 8.2 years (range: 8-70 years). The majority were male (126, 90.6%), and the most common mode of injury was firearm trauma (83, 59.7%). The most frequently observed complications were pneumothorax (110, 79.1%), hemothorax (112, 80.6%), and lung injury (88, 63.3%). Fractures were noted in 54 (38.8%) patients, with rib fractures being the most common (31, 22.3%). The most common management approach was tube thoracostomy (116, 83.5%), followed by conservative management (10, 7.2%) and open thoracotomy (6, 4.3%). Conclusion CT imaging is an invaluable tool in the assessment of penetrating chest trauma, aiding in the identification of hidden injuries and influencing surgical management decisions. Although thin-slice contrast-enhanced CT is the standard protocol in our resource-constrained setting, non-contrast axial CT scans offer critical diagnostic information and guide timely management. Its use significantly improves patient outcomes, especially in a resource-limited setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.