Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958031›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Comparison of ICU Mortality Rates Among Critically Ill COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients Across the First and Second Waves: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Tejas Vm, Veena Rm, Mohan Me

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tejas VmInternal Medicine, BGS Global Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, IND.
Veena RmPharmacology, BGS Global Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, IND.
Mohan MeInternal Medicine, BGS Global Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe experience gained from managing the first wave of the pandemic, combined with the abundance of scientific evidence, enabled physicians to identify risk factors for mortality outcomes and evaluate the effectiveness of respiratory support measures, vaccines, and drugs. This knowledge empowered them to confront the subsequent waves with greater expertise. Despite these advancements, the mortality rate among critical COVID-19 patients remained alarmingly high worldwide during these waves. It is uncertain whether advancements in critical care during the pandemic have improved outcomes for critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs).

methodsThis was an observational, retrospective cohort study utilizing the collected data from COVID-19 patients between May to July 2020 and May to July 2021 at the Medical Records Department (MRD) section of BGS Global Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka.

resultsThe mortality rate was higher among males in 2020 (66.1%) and 2021 (65.7%) compared to females in 2020 (33.9%) and 2021 (34.3%), with males accounting for nearly double the proportion of deaths in both waves. In 2020, the highest mortality was observed in the age group of 41-50 years (27.1%), while in 2021, it was noted in the age group of 51-60 years (24.3%). Altogether, patients in the age group of 41-60 years were the ones who were mostly affected in both waves. The average hospital stay increased from 3.8 days in the first wave to 7.4 days in the second. Diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia with comorbidities while being admitted into the ICUs accounted for 11.5% of cases in the first wave, rising to 68.6% in the second wave. Cause of death solely due to type 1 respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome was reported in 92.3% of cases in 2020 and 70.7% in 2021. In contrast, other non-respiratory causes contributed to 7.7% of deaths in 2020 and 29.3% in 2021.

conclusionThis study provides insights into the ICU mortality trends in critically ill COVID-19 pneumonia patients during the first and second waves of the global pandemic. Despite advancements in disease knowledge, treatment protocols, and healthcare system management, no significant improvement in the mortality rates was found in our study. The mutations of the virus, which enhanced its transmissibility and immune escape characteristics, greatly contributed to our findings. Adoption of stringent social distancing, regular screening, early reporting of symptoms by the patient, well-established isolation, strict adherence to standard operating procedures (SOPs), and health advisory guidelines reduced ICU occupancy by patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia only, making room for complex cases to receive adequate timely care and treatment during the second wave. Limitations of the study include its single-center study design, missing data, and lack of post-vaccination data, all of which must be duly considered.

Indexed as

ardscovidcovid-19criticaldeath ratesfirst waveicumortality ratespandemicsecond wave

Identifiers

PMID39958031
PMCPMC11830393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.