Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39958017›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Effect of Heat Therapy on Pain During the First Stage of Labor Among Primigravid Women: A Pilot Study.

Isabel Lawot, Imran Khan, Nitika Thakur, Tumla Shrestha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isabel LawotDepartment of Nursing, Sharda School of Nursing Science and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, IND.
Imran KhanDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Sharda School of Nursing Science and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, IND.
Nitika ThakurDepartment of Pediatrics, Sharda School of Nursing Science and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida, IND.
Tumla ShresthaDepartment of Child Health Nursing, Maharajgunj Nursing Campus, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, NPL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Labor pain is often one of the most severe pains a woman may feel in her lifetime, and childbirth is usually considered one of the most physically demanding experiences a woman may have. An effective and safe midwifery intervention for reducing labor pain in pregnant women is the administration of heat. Aim The objective of the article is to compare the effectiveness of lumbosacral heat application on pain throughout the active first stage of labor between the interventional and control groups. Method A randomized controlled trial among 10 low-risk primigravid women admitted to Bharatpur Hospital in Chitwan, Nepal, was carried out to evaluate the intensity of pain and duration of the active first phase of labor by allocating them randomly into intervention (5) and control groups (5); one group received heat therapy on the lumbosacral region, while the other received standard care. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was applied as an instrument to assess pain four times: before heat therapy at 4-5 cm of cervix dilation and three times after heat application at 4-5, 7-8, and 9-10 cm. The data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially using a repeated measures ANOVA test. Results The mean age of the mothers was 21.80±3.327, most of them belonged to the low socioeconomic class, all of them were living in joint families, 80% of participants had less than 18.5 body mass index, all participants had visited an antenatal clinic for check-ups, and 60% had spontaneous labor started. The findings show a higher labor pain score before intervention (mean=6.80) which progressively decreased after an intervention: post-test 2 (M=6.20; SD=0.83), post-test 3 (M=5.60; SD=0.89), and post-test 4 (M=5.00; SD=0.70). The mean, standard deviation, and F-value of labor pain before and after the application of heat therapy among primigravid women indicated a significant mean difference in labor pain (F (3,12)=4.500; MES=0.66; p=0.025; η2=0.53) with a large effect size in contrast to the control group. The p-value for post-test 4 was 0.025, representing that the null hypothesis was rejected. This acclaims that heat therapy has an effect on labor pain. Conclusion It is concluded that the application of heat on the lower back during labor lowered the pain level experienced by primigravid women in the interventional group compared to those in the control group. Thus, heat therapy can be considered a viable method for managing labor pain.

Indexed as

heatlabor painprimigravidatherapywomen

Identifiers

PMID39958017
PMCPMC11830423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.