ArticleCureus2025
Evaluating Determinants of Length of Stay in Burn Care: Is One Day per 1% Total Burn Surface Area Still Accurate?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Despite advances in burn care, morbidity and mortality remain high. There is a large gap in research focusing on resource-limited Appalachian burn victims. Appalachia is unique in many different ways. The region is well known nationally for poor healthcare outcomes, household income below the national average, ranking high in addiction and drug use crisis, and characterized with a high prevalence of comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), coronary artery disease, and obesity. To complicate this devastating imbalance, Cabell Huntington Hospital is the sole burn intensive care unit in the state of West Virginia, with only six beds available. It is crucial to understand the factors that prolong the length of stay (LOS), as LOS is a key indicator for healthcare resource utilization, especially in this resource-limited population. This study aims to identify factors that influence LOS among burn patients in Appalachia, focusing on demographic and clinical variables. Methodology A retrospective analysis was conducted among 748 patients between January 1, 2017, and January 1, 2023. Demographic and clinical variables, including age, gender, COPD, DM, smoking history, inhalational injury, burn source, body mass index (BMI), total burn surface area (TBSA), and total ventilation duration (TVD), were collected. Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of LOS. Statistical significance was set at p-values <0.05. Results Significant predictors of prolonged LOS included TVD (β = 1.25, p < 0.001), TBSA (β = 0.60, p < 0.001), inhalational injury (β = 6.02, p < 0.001), and burn source (thermal contact with metal: β = 10.68, p = 0.003). Discharge status (dead) was associated with shorter LOS (β = -17.09, p < 0.001). For every additional day of ventilation, LOS increased by approximately 1.25 days. Each percentage increase in TBSA contributed to a 0.6-day increase in LOS. Patients who died had a hospital stay approximately 17 days shorter than those who survived. The presence of inhalational injury extended the LOS by an average of six days. Age, gender, COPD, DM, BMI, and smoking history were not significantly associated with LOS. Conclusions Newer predictor models should be used to combine TBSA with other demographics, comorbidities, and burn factors, such as inhalation injury and TVD, to provide a more accurate LOS for patients, their loved ones, and caregivers. The rule that for every 1% TBSA burned LOS increases with one day does not hold in our population. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing burn care in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.