ArticleCureus2025
Effectiveness of Combined Oral Minoxidil and Finasteride in Male Androgenetic Alopecia: A Retrospective Service Evaluation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging pharmacotherapies and regenerative solutions for promoting hair growth for androgenetic alopecia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Stem cell-based approaches for alopecia: A narrative review of current and emerging treatment strategies.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMale pattern baldness (MPB) also known as androgenetic alopecia (AA) affects approximately half of men by the fifth decade, and significantly influences both psychological well-being and quality of life. Existing pharmacotherapies include oral finasteride, which reduces dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels and slows follicular miniaturization, and topical minoxidil, which enhances follicular blood flow and extends the anagen phase. However, adherence to topical regimens can be suboptimal. A combined oral low-dose minoxidil (2.5 mg)-finasteride (1 mg) "All-in-One" regimen could improve convenience, adherence, and possibly efficacy.
objectiveThis retrospective study sought to (i) assess the efficacy of a combined oral minoxidil-finasteride therapy over 12 months in a real-world AA cohort; (ii) determine inter-rater reliability of hair loss scoring metrics; and (iii) examine how baseline Norwood severity influences outcomes and effect sizes.
methodsData were collected from a UK-based digital health service between January 2020 and December 2023. Eligible men, aged ≥18, with Norwood stages 2-7 AA, initiated combined oral therapy. All had baseline and 12-month follow-up images. The primary outcome was the mean change in hair density according to a clinician-rated 7-point scale. A one-sample t-test compared the mean change to zero (no change). Cohen's d and Hedge's g estimated effect sizes, and Cohen's kappa assessed inter-rater reliability.
resultsOut of 502 men, 92.4% (N = 464) achieved stable or improved outcomes (≥0), and 57.4% (N = 288) showed marked improvements (>0). The inverse-variance weighted mean 7-point change was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.51-0.65; p<0.001; N = 502), indicating significant improvement relative to no change. More severe baseline categories achieved equal or greater gains, with effect sizes up to d≈1.0. Kappa values were modest (Norwood: κ=0.33; 7-point: κ=0.20), indicating fair to slight agreement.
conclusionsThe combined oral minoxidil-finasteride regimen produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements (p<0.001; N = 502) in AA over 12 months. The substantial proportion of stable/improved patients (92.4%, N = 464) and large effect sizes in severe stages highlight its potential. However, modest inter-rater reliability underscores the need for refined protocols or potential AI-driven evaluations. Future prospective trials should confirm these findings and explore optimal dosing, patient selection, and long-term durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.