ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
The Role of Computed Tomography in Achieving True External Rotation in Robotic Knee Replacement: A Retrospective Analysis of 300 Knees.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Midflexion gap (MFG) malalignment remains a challenge in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), often attributed to inaccurate femoral component positioning. Precise determination of true external rotation (TER) is crucial for optimal implant orientation and MFG reduction. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of computed tomography (CT)-based TER measurement in robotic knee replacements. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 300 patients who underwent robotic TKA using a system that incorporates CT-derived bone models. TER was measured preoperatively on CT scans. Results: The mean posterior condylar angle (PCA) (n = 300) between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and the posterior condylar axis was 2.87 ± 0.73° (95% confidence interval [CI]) with a range of 2.14-3.6°. The external rotation between the anatomical and surgical TEA is 1.19 ± 0.94° (95% CI) with a range of 0.25-2.13°. Intraclass correlation coefficient for the angle is 1 (TEA) and 0.98 (PCA). This highlights potential discrepancies between traditional radiographic measurements and actual TER. Femoral component positioning aligned closer to the CT-based TER compared to standard methods. In addition, a significant reduction in MFG was observed in knees with TER-guided implant placement. Conclusion: CT-based TER measurement provides a more accurate assessment of femoral rotation compared to conventional radiographs. This improved precision translates into optimal implant positioning and significantly reduces MFG malalignment in robotic knee replacements. Our findings suggest that incorporating CT-based TER into the workflow can enhance the accuracy and outcomes of robotic TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.