ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Suprapatellar Technique for Tibia Fractures: Is the Fracture Level Important?
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A frequent bone fracture in falls and auto accidents is the tibial fracture. This study is prospective observational study primary aim to assess the healing duration, alignment, lower extremity functional score, and complications associated with suprapatellar (SP) tibial intramedullary nailing (IMN) for proximal, shaft, and distal tibial fractures. Material and Methods: Fifty-two patients (44 men and 8 women; mean age 46.9 years; range, 18-75 years) receiving semi-extended treatment using the SP method were included in the research. A solitary surgeon conducted SP IMN operations. Patients' genders, ages, limb sides, fracture types, and classifications were noted following a minimum of a 12-month follow-up. Analysis was done on non-union, angulation, healing duration, and fracture reduction accuracy. Clinical measures were performed using the lower extremity functional score scale. Results: In the tibia, 24 fractures occurred in the proximal third, 12 in the middle third, and 16 in the distal third. The average healing period was 7.34 months, with a range of 4-14 months. There was no statistically significant difference in healing times between the sites of the fractures (P = 0.75). There were no statistically significant variations in follow-up periods with respect to fracture locations (P = 0.62). The mean follow-up length was 15.76 months (range, 12-28 months). There was no statistically significant difference in lower extremity functional scores across the fracture site groups (P = 0.33). Conclusion: Irrespective of fracture level, the SP IM tibia nailing has comparable functional score, a lower incidence of malalignment, shorter recovery periods, and less need for open reduction for any type of extra Articular tibia shaft fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.