ArticleAnnals of maxillofacial surgery
Efficacy of Autofluorescence in Detection of Tobacco-associated Oral Mucosal Lesions - A Systematic Review.
Article in Annals of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study was conducted with the aim to systematically review the efficacy of autofluorescence in the detection of tobacco-associated oral mucosal lesions. Objectives and Data Sources: Clinical studies with patients that focused on the autofluorescence method in the detection, visualisation, or management of tobacco-associated oral mucosal lesions were included in the literature search across bibliographic databases. Results: Autofluorescence visualisation showed positive results, with high sensitivity scores when compared with the gold standard of histopathology in the clinical evaluation of common tobacco-associated oral mucosal lesions. However, the low specificity values indicate its limited ability to distinguish between dysplasia and other benign conditions. Conclusions and Implications: This review provides promising evidence for the application of autofluorescence in the detection of tobacco-associated oral mucosal lesions where autofluorescence is used in conjunction with conventional examination with the gold standard of histopathological examination. Registration number: PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023442292.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.