ArticleNeurosurgery practice2024
Machine Learning-Driven Prognostication in Traumatic Subdural Hematoma: Development of a Predictive Web Application.
Article in Neurosurgery practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embracing Large Language Models for Medical Applications, Part II: Building a Framework for Clinical Stewardship.Cureus · 2026Article
- Established machine learning matches tabular foundation models in clinical predictions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesOur focus was on creating an array of machine learning (ML) models to predict unfavorable in-hospital outcomes after acute traumatic subdural hematoma (atSDH). Our subsequent aim was to deploy these models in an accessible web application, showcasing their practical value.
methodsData from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program database were used to identify patients with atSDH. In-hospital mortality was the primary outcome of interest. Secondary outcomes were (1) nonhome discharges, (2) prolonged length of stay (LOS), (3) prolonged length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU-LOS), and (4) major complications. Feature selection was performed with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm. Five ML algorithms, including TabPFN, TabNET, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest, were used along with the Optuna optimization library for hyperparameter tuning.
resultsThere were 104 055 patients included in the analysis for the outcome mortality, 82 988 for the outcome nonhome discharges, 104 207 for the outcome prolonged LOS, 62 543 for the outcome prolonged ICU-LOS, and 100 241 for the outcome major complications. The models with the highest area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values included TabPFN for mortality and major complications, and LightGBM for nonhome discharges, prolonged LOS, and ICU-LOS. The TabPFN model for the primary outcome of our study, in-hospital mortality, showed an AUROC of 0.934. The models with the highest AUROC values were integrated into an application to predict the outcomes of interest.
conclusionOur findings show that ML tools aid in predicting various outcomes for patients with atSDH. We developed a web application that has the potential to integrate the developed models into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.