ArticleNeurophotonics2025
Revisiting equivalent optical properties for cerebrospinal fluid to improve diffusion-based modeling accuracy in the brain.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical performance of minimally invasive brain implants: a simulation and phantom study.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Functional dual-slope frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy data interpreted with two- and three-layer models.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Article
- A contemporary systematic review on deterministic numerical simulations of light propagation in head tissues.Biophysical reviews · 2026Review
- Article
- Anisotropic light propagation in human brain white matter.Neurophotonics · 2025Article
- Direct 3-D printing of complex optical phantoms using dynamic filament mixing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fabrication of complex optical phantoms using on-the-fly multi-filament mixing 3-D printing.Research square · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: The diffusion approximation (DA) is used in functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies despite its known limitations due to the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Many of these studies rely on a set of empirical CSF optical properties, recommended by a previous simulation study, that were not selected for the purpose of minimizing DA modeling errors. Aim: We aim to directly quantify the accuracy of DA solutions in brain models by comparing those with the gold-standard solutions produced by the mesh-based Monte Carlo (MMC), based on which we derive updated recommendations. Approach: For both a five-layer head and Colin27 atlas models, we obtain DA solutions by independently sweeping the CSF absorption ( Results: Our results suggest that previously recommended CSF properties can cause significant errors (8.7% to 52%) in multiple tested metrics. By simultaneously sweeping Conclusions: Our updated recommendation of CSF equivalent optical properties can greatly reduce the model mismatches between DA and MMC solutions at multiple metrics without sacrificing computational speed. We also show that it is possible to eliminate such a mismatch for a single or a pair of metrics of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.