Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39957773›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2024

Sex-disaggregated patterns in tuberculosis treatment coverage and outcomes among a nationally representative sample of deaths in India: 2019-2022.

Rakhi Dandona, G Anil Kumar, S Siva Prasad Dora, Md Akbar, Kultar Singh, Sibin George, Moutushi Majumder, Navin Kumar, Rajendra P Joshi, Mrigen Deka and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Rakhi DandonaPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
G Anil KumarPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
S Siva Prasad DoraPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Md AkbarPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Kultar SinghSambodhi Research and Communication Pvt Ltd, Noida, India.
Sibin GeorgePublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Moutushi MajumderPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Navin KumarSambodhi Research and Communication Pvt Ltd, Noida, India.
Rajendra P JoshiCentral TB Division, National TB Elimination Programme, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, New Delhi, India.
Mrigen DekaCentral TB Division, National TB Elimination Programme, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, New Delhi, India.
Dimple PanchalCentral TB Division, National TB Elimination Programme, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, New Delhi, India.
Venkatesh RoddawarTIFA India, John Snow India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India.
Amar ShahHealth Office, USAID/India, New Delhi, India.
Vikas ChoudharySambodhi Research and Communication Pvt Ltd, Noida, India.
Yogesh N PatelTIFA India, John Snow India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India.
Bhavin VaderaHealth Office, USAID/India, New Delhi, India.
Kiran RadeWorld Health Organization, India Office, New Delhi, India.
Lalit DandonaPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Raghuram RaoCentral TB Division, National TB Elimination Programme, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, New Delhi, India.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We report on TB treatment coverage and outcomes by sex among a nationally representative sample of deaths in the background of the national framework for a gender-responsive approach to TB adopted by India. Methods: Detailed interviews were undertaken for a nationally representative sample of deaths of all ages between 2019 and 2022 from the adult most knowledgeable about the deceased. Details about TB treatment were documented for females and males for whom history of TB diagnosis ever. Findings: Detailed data were available for 26,957 (92.1% participation) deaths. The prevalence of TB diagnosis ever was 2.9% (95% CI 2.6-3.2) and 5.8% (95% CI 5.4-6.1) among females and males, respectively. TB treatment coverage was similar for females (81.4%; 95% CI 76.7-85.3) and males (82.4%; 95% CI 79.8-84.7). TB treatment coverage was significantly lower for males with TB diagnosis in years 2021 and 2022 as compared to those diagnosed in 2019 (-12.1%; 95% CI -22.7 to -1.5). A similar proportion of females (55%) and males (58.9%) were on TB treatment at the time of death, had completed TB treatment (39.3% females and 35% males, and had discontinued TB treatment (5.3% females and 5.2% males); significant variation in treatment status was seen by age and state for both, and by wealth index quartile for males. Majority took TB treatment from public sector (females 72.9% and males 76.0%). Interpretation: The sex-disaggregated findings from this nationally representative sample of deaths are a value-add to effectively address TB in India as majority of such understanding towards gender-responsive strategies is available from those who are alive. Funding: United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Indexed as

GenderIndiaSurvivalTBTreatment coverageTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID39957773
PMCPMC11827004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.