ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024
Artificial intelligence conversational agents in mental health: Patients see potential, but prefer humans in the loop.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Therapeutic Interaction Features of AI Chatbots in Depression Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Possible Role and Function of AI Conversational Agents in Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Large Language Models as a New Tool for Therapists in Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Blinded Clinician Rating Pilot Experiment.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Conversational Mental Health Chatbots: Protocol for a Systematic Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the emergency department-- applications, perceptions and limitations: a narrative review.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Real-World Engagement With a Generative AI Conversational Agent for Mental Health Support: Retrospective Descriptive Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- The Technologically Mediated Motherhood Constellation: Smartphone and AI as Novel Actors in Maternal Psychic Organization.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
- Current themes of AI in mental health: Actionable evidence and guardrails for mood and anxiety care.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of AI and rule-based conversational agents for depression, anxiety and stress: A meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Large Language Model-Based Conversational Agents in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Personalized Insights Derived from Wearable Device Data and Large Language Models to Improve Well-Being.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Understanding psychiatrist readiness for AI: a study of access, self-efficacy, trust, and design expectations.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- A bridge, not a destination: YouTube viewer perspectives on AI mental health support and human therapy.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Trauma-informed conversational agents for mental health: understanding user perspectives and experiences.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Information quality, readability, and empathy of AI-generated public mental health information: a comparative evaluation of eight large language models.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Behavioral intention to use mental health chatbots in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional UTAUT-based study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Molecular pathways linking chronic psychological stress to accelerated aging: mechanisms and interventions.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- Human-AI co-research on design and evaluation of Embodied Conversational Agent in rehabilitation contexts.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- Conversational AI or a human professional for mental health advice? Exploring prevalence and public preferences in Australian adults.Australian journal of psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital mental health interventions, such as artificial intelligence (AI) conversational agents, hold promise for improving access to care by innovating therapy and supporting delivery. However, little research exists on patient perspectives regarding AI conversational agents, which is crucial for their successful implementation. This study aimed to fill the gap by exploring patients' perceptions and acceptability of AI conversational agents in mental healthcare. Methods: Adults with self-reported mild to moderate anxiety were recruited from the UMass Memorial Health system. Participants engaged in semi-structured interviews to discuss their experiences, perceptions, and acceptability of AI conversational agents in mental healthcare. Anxiety levels were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. Data were collected from December 2022 to February 2023, and three researchers conducted rapid qualitative analysis to identify and synthesize themes. Results: The sample included 29 adults (ages 19-66), predominantly under age 35, non-Hispanic, White, and female. Participants reported a range of positive and negative experiences with AI conversational agents. Most held positive attitudes towards AI conversational agents, appreciating their utility and potential to increase access to care, yet some also expressed cautious optimism. About half endorsed negative opinions, citing AI's lack of empathy, technical limitations in addressing complex mental health situations, and data privacy concerns. Most participants desired some human involvement in AI-driven therapy and expressed concern about the risk of AI conversational agents being seen as replacements for therapy. A subgroup preferred AI conversational agents for administrative tasks rather than care provision. Conclusions: AI conversational agents were perceived as useful and beneficial for increasing access to care, but concerns about AI's empathy, capabilities, safety, and human involvement in mental healthcare were prevalent. Future implementation and integration of AI conversational agents should consider patient perspectives to enhance their acceptability and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.