Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39957729›Full record

ArticleData in brief2024

Comprehensive dataset of heterogeneous network structures in traditional chinese medicine research.

Parastoo Fathi, Nasrollah Moghaddam Charkari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Parastoo FathiFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Nasrollah Moghaddam CharkariFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This dataset presents a comprehensive collection of heterogeneous network structures commonly encountered in biomedical research. The dataset encompasses diverse types of networks, including protein-protein interaction networks, herb-target interaction networks, herb-symptom interaction networks, herb-herb association networks, and symptom-symptom association networks. Each network is represented as a graph, with nodes representing entities such as proteins, herb, symptoms, and efficacy, and edges representing the relationships between these entities. The dataset provides detailed descriptions of the nodes and edges in each network, along with metadata such as node attributes where applicable. This dataset serves as a valuable resource for researchers studying complex biological systems and exploring relationships between various biomedical entities.

Indexed as

Biomedical researchGraph dataHerb-target interactionsNetwork analysisProtein-protein interactionsSymptom-phenotype associations

Identifiers

PMID39957729
PMCPMC11827087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.