Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39957718›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of occupational medicine and environmental health2025

Should limit values be set for infrasound caused by wind turbines?

Małgorzata Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska, Tadeusz Wszołek, Adam Dudarewicz, Paweł Małecki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Małgorzata Pawlaczyk-ŁuszczyńskaNofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland (Department of Vibroacoustic Hazards).
Tadeusz WszołekAGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, Department of Mechanics and Vibroacoustics).
Adam DudarewiczNofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland (Department of Vibroacoustic Hazards).
Paweł MałeckiAGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, Department of Mechanics and Vibroacoustics).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study focuses on setting outdoor exposure limits for wind turbine infrasound, as most countries currently have no specific limits for this type of noise. A review of the literature on the effects of wind turbine infrasound and the methods used worldwide to measure and assess environmental exposure to infrasound formed the basis for setting limits. According to the literature, human tolerance to infrasound is defined by the hearing threshold, which is not yet standardized. Therefore, a G96 curve (corresponding to tones with the G-weighted sound pressure level (SPL) equal to 96 dB) was used to determine the mean hearing threshold in the 1-20 Hz frequency range. Infrasound that cannot be heard (or felt) is not annoying and does not cause other adverse health effects. The infrasound levels measured around wind farms are well below the hearing threshold. Few countries have set limits for infrasound in either outdoor or indoor environments. The study proposes the G-weighted equivalent SPL as the basis for assessing exposure to infrasound from wind turbines. It also specifies preliminary short-term indices (i.e., G-weighted equivalent SPLs for daytime [L

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureNoisePower PlantsWindAuditory ThresholdHumansannoyanceenvironmental exposurehearing thresholdinfrasoundlimit valueswind turbines

Identifiers

PMID39957718
PMCPMC11952193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.