Trial reportStroke2025
Speech Therapy Combined With Cerebrolysin in Enhancing Nonfluent Aphasia Recovery After Acute Ischemic Stroke: ESCAS Randomized Pilot Study.
Trial report in Stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvement of aphasia deficits following traumatic intracranial hemorrhage: a case report.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Article
- Cerebrolysin as an adjunct to speech-language therapy in post-stroke Wernicke's aphasia: a case report.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Article
- Cerebrolysin after Endovascular Thrombectomy in Stroke: 12‑Month Functional Outcomes in a Propensity‑Matched Cohort.Translational stroke research · 2026Article
- The nonlinear trajectory of post-stroke aphasia recovery.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Very Early Short-Course Cerebrolysin After Tenecteplase and Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Case Report.Case reports in neurological medicine · 2026Article
- Microglial Polarization and Therapeutic Strategies in Post-stroke Neuroinflammation.Neurology and therapy · 2025Review
- C-REGS2-A multinational, high-quality comparative effectiveness study of Cerebrolysin in moderate acute ischemic stroke.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025Article
- Review
- Is Cerebrolysin Useful in Psychiatry Disorders?Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Safety and feasibility of cerebrolysin in treatment of primary intracerebral hemorrhage (CLINCH)-a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint pilot trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Delta power surge and alpha power decline in traumatic brain injury recovery: A quantitative EEG analysis of the CAPTAIN-rTMS trial.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStroke-induced aphasia significantly impacts communication and quality of life. Despite the standard treatment being speech and language therapy, outcomes vary, highlighting the need for additional therapies. Cerebrolysin, a neuroprotective and neurotrophic agent, has shown potential in stroke management. This study addresses the notable gap in research about the combined use of Cerebrolysin and speech therapy, evaluating their synergistic potential in the treatment of aphasia.
methodsThe ESCAS trial (The Efficacy and Safety of Cerebrolysin in the Treatment of Aphasia After Acute Ischemic Stroke), a prospective, randomized-controlled, double-blinded study was conducted in 2 Romanian stroke centers. Participants included those with left middle cerebral artery territory ischemic stroke and nonfluent aphasia, enrolled 3 to 5 days poststroke. Inclusion criteria were right-handedness and Romanian as the mother tongue. Participants received Cerebrolysin or a placebo combined with speech and language therapy in 10-day cycles over 3 intervals, and evaluations were done at baseline, 30, 60, and 90 days respectively. The main outcome measure was Western Aphasia Battery for language function. Changes at days 30, 60, and 90 compared with baseline were quantified, and the effect estimand used was the difference in means between groups. Secondary outcome measurements were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for neurological deficit, the modified Rankin Scale for global disability, and the Barthel Index for activities of daily living.
resultsOut of 132 enrolled patients, 123 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, and 120 in the per-protocol analysis. Overall, both groups showed improvement at subsequent visits compared with the baseline for Western Aphasia Battery and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The Cerebrolysin group showed greater improvements in Western Aphasia Battery (visit 4 mean increase of 35.579±16.316 [95% CI, 31.289-39.869] points;
conclusionsCerebrolysin combined with speech and language therapy offers promising potential for enhancing recovery in poststroke nonfluent aphasia. Significant improvements were observed in language and neurological deficits, underscoring the importance of adjunctive therapies in nonfluent aphasia rehabilitation. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to fully establish the efficacy of this combination therapy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.isrctn.com; Unique identifier: ISRCTN54581790.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.