ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Linking Subclinical Autistic Traits and Perceptual Category Learning.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From cognitive abstraction to adaptive behavior: neural bases of concept learning in autistic adolescents.Molecular autism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autism spectrum condition is a neurodevelopmental condition with difficulties in social interaction, communication and repetitive behaviours. Autistic individuals often exhibit difficulties in non-social cognitive processing, such as grouping items into meaningful categories based on their holistic visual appearance. Underlying mechanisms might be a deficit in abstracting a category's central tendency (i.e., the prototype) or more general atypicalities in visual category learning processes. Milder autistic traits often also extend to a broader autism phenotype in neurotypical individuals. Our study compared adult neurotypical individuals with high or low autistic traits on behavioural performances and neural correlates measured by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a single-category perceptual categorization task, based on the well-known dot-pattern paradigm. Bayesian computational modelling was used to investigate links between autistic traits and representing category knowledge by the prototype or memorizing single exemplars. We found that a high degree of autistic traits was linked to worse accuracy for endorsing category members. Autistic trait groups also differed in neural correlates during the training phase related to visual processing in occipital regions, decision-making in midfrontal regions and the posterior cingulate, and feedback processing in the posterior cingulate and the ventral striatum. Model-based analyses did not support deficits in prototype abstraction but yielded a link between autistic traits and stricter decision policies. In sum, we found no relationship between high autistic traits and difficulties with the prototype strategy but more general atypicalities in visual category learning processes, namely, visual processing, decision-making and feedback processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.