Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39957380›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2025

Fractional Anisotropy of Cingulum Cingulate Mediates the Relationship Between Happiness and Work Performance in Healthy Individuals.

Keisuke Kokubun, Kiyotaka Nemoto, Yoshinori Yamakawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keisuke KokubunOpen Innovation Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-5049
Kiyotaka NemotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8623-9829
Yoshinori YamakawaOpen Innovation Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7995-1794

Funding

ImPACT Program of the Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (Cabinet Office, Government of Japan)JSPS KAKENHI JP17H06151JSPS KAKENHI JP21K12153JSPS KAKENHI JP22K01695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs competition among companies around the world intensifies, the nature of work and the performance required are becoming more complex. In parallel with this, there is growing attention on happiness and well-being as factors related to improving employee performance. However, little is known about the relationship between happiness and the brain and work performance in healthy people.

methodsTherefore, we analyzed the correlations between the nine categories of work role performance (WRP), the subjective happiness scale (SHS), and four regions of fractional anisotropy (FA), an index reflecting brain microstructure that has been shown to be related to apathy in previous studies.

resultsIt was shown that the cingulum cingulate (CCI) and the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) correlated with the WRP and its facets in a manner consistent with their respective functions. In particular, the CCI was found to be extensively correlated with the facets of the WRP and to have a partially mediating effect on the relationship between the SHS and the WRP.

conclusionThis study is the first to show that indicators reflecting healthy individuals' happiness and brain microstructure, which are related to a variety of nonwork factors, are positively correlated with the diverse roles and performance that characterize modern work.

Indexed as

Gyrus CinguliHappinessWork PerformanceAdultAnisotropyDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultcingulum cingulatefractional anisotropyhappinessperformancesuperior longitudinal fasciculuswork role

Identifiers

PMID39957380
PMCPMC11831004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.