Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39957332›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of haematology2025

Treatment-Free Remission Outcomes in a BCR::ABL1 Digital PCR Selected Clinical Cohort of CML Patients.

C Kockerols, P J M Valk, P Hogenbirk, I Geelen, N M A Blijlevens, J J W M Janssen, M Hoogendoorn, S Kersting, S K Klein, L G M Daenen and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

C KockerolsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6198-7035
P J M ValkDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
P HogenbirkDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
I GeelenDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9470-476X
N M A BlijlevensDepartment of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J J W M JanssenDepartment of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
M HoogendoornDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
S KerstingDepartment of Hematology, Haga Ziekenhuis, The Netherlands.
S K KleinDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
L G M DaenenDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M DonkerDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P A W Te BoekhorstDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
K-S G JieDepartment of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
M CorstenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
M J CruijsenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
H LevengaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, The Netherlands.
W M SmitDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
M-D LevinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
E de JonghDepartment of Internal Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
S de JongeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A J VlotDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rijnstate Ziekenhuis, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
M F DurianDepartment of Internal Medicine, Elizabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
J J ZwagingaDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
M MohlmannDepartment of Internal Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
T J WustmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Assen, Assen, The Netherlands.
R BlommersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
J J CornelissenDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
P E WesterweelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-7039
Collaborating Authors

Funding

ZonMw 848101002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 40%-60% of patients reaching a stable deep molecular response during TKI treatment will maintain a state of remission after TKI discontinuation, denoted as treatment-free remission (TFR). Depth of molecular response assessed by BCR::ABL1 digital PCR prior to TKI discontinuation has demonstrated its significance as a reliable predictive parameter for TFR. A clinically applicable prediction cutoff of 0.0023%IS has been established and externally validated. In this study, BCR::ABL1 digital PCR, as most sensitive and stable assay of its kind, was investigated as a TFR prediction tool in the Netherlands, and evaluated for its predictive value to stop TKI treatment below the aforementioned cutoff. The primary endpoint of molecular recurrence (MolR, BCR::ABL1 > 0.1%IS) at 12 months was prospectively assessed. Overall, 67 discontinued patients below the set BCR::ABL1 digital PCR cutoff were included. The overall MolR probability was 50% (95% CI, 36%-62%). In 38 patients treated for more than 6 years as commonly recommended as desirable treatment duration before TFR attempt, the MolR probability dropped to 36% (95% CI, 18%-50%). Patients attempting an early TKI discontinuation (treated for less than 6 years) had a high MolR probability of 76% (95% CI, 65%-89%). BCR::ABL1 digital PCR was successfully used in Dutch clinical practice. Our study indicates that in patients with a low BCR::ABL1 digital PCR result, a total TKI treatment duration of six or more years remains associated with a lower MolR rate and should generally be pursued. In patients treated for more than 6 years, BCR::ABL1 digital PCR was capable to identify stop candidates with a higher probability of TFR success.

Indexed as

Fusion Proteins, bcr-ablLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositivePolymerase Chain ReactionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBCR-ABL1 fusion protein, humanFusion Proteins, bcr-ablProtein Kinase InhibitorsBCR::ABL1 digital PCRchronic myeloid leukemiatreatment‐free remissiontyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment discontinuation

Identifiers

PMID39957332
PMCPMC11976696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.