ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology2025
Thoracic Cancer Exercise Services in Australia: A Point-Prevalence Survey.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oncology Rehabilitation in Australia: A National Survey Update.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Development of a clinical core outcome set to evaluate lung cancer rehabilitation.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Implementation of a preoperative exercise programme in lung cancer resection: protocol for a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer guidelines recommend pre- and rehabilitation; however, current research shows these services are not well integrated into clinical practice. To date, there has been no prospective audit of Australian lung cancer exercise services or the people accessing these services. The aim of this study was to describe the exercise pre- and rehabilitation services available to people with thoracic cancer and the characteristics of people with thoracic cancer attending these services in Australia.
methodsProspective, observational, multicenter, 5-day, point-prevalence study. Australian healthcare services likely to provide exercise services to people with thoracic cancer were contacted to participate. Conduct and reporting followed the CROSS guidelines.
resultsA total of 397 services were contacted, and 203 responded (51%). Overall, 67% (n = 137) accepted thoracic cancer referrals, and 107 (78%) completed the survey. Most exercise services were targeted at respiratory disease (58%, n = 60) compared with 31% cancer-specific (n = 33) and 5% lung cancer-specific (n = 5). A total of 73 patients with thoracic cancer attended programs across 41 sites (38%). Mean (SD) age was 68.5 (9.7) years. Overall, 4% of patients (n = 3) were culturally and linguistically diverse, and none identified as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. A total of 19 outcomes were used in 51 combinations to assess participants (n = 70), and 12 exercise interventions were delivered in 45 combinations (n = 67).
conclusionsOne-third of responding exercise programs did not offer exercise services to people with thoracic cancer. Almost two-thirds of services that accept referrals did not have a thoracic cancer patient attend their service. High heterogeneity in outcome measures and exercise interventions was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.