Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39957149›Full record

ArticlePharmacogenomics2024

Sherin Shaaban, Brandon S Walker, Yuan Ji, Kamisha Johnson-Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacogenomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sherin ShaabanDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Brandon S WalkerARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Yuan JiDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Kamisha Johnson-DavisDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo share the experience of a US national reference laboratory, offering genotyping for

methodsRetrospective review of archived datasets related to thiopurines drug therapy including patients' data that underwent

resultsThirteen percent of patients had variants in one or both genes tested. Testing for

conclusionAdding

Indexed as

MercaptopurineMethyltransferasesPurinesPyrophosphatasesAdolescentAdultAgedAzathioprineChildDrug MonitoringFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNudix HydrolasesAzathioprineMercaptopurineMethyltransferasesNudix HydrolasesNUDT15 protein, humanPurinesPyrophosphatasesthiopurine methyltransferaseTPMT protein, humandrug monitoringgenotypingNUDT15PharmacogenomicsphenotypingthiopurinesTPMT

Identifiers

PMID39957149
PMCPMC11901404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.