Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39957129›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

Retrospective Study to Compare Injury Patterns and Associations in 170 Patients Following Electric Scooter and Bicycle Accidents in Turkey.

Ümit Şimşek, Tuğçen Demircan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ümit ŞimşekDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3544-8871
Tuğçen DemircanDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7331-7234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Bicycle use has long been encouraged in urban areas in Turkey as a safe and sustainable mode of transport, supported by dedicated bicycle paths and traffic regulations. However, the recent rise in the popularity of electric scooters (e-scooters) has introduced new safety concerns, leading to injuries among riders, pedestrians, and other road users. This retrospective study compared injury patterns and associated factors in 170 patients involved in e-scooter and bicycle accidents in Eskişehir, Turkey. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study included 170 patients (54 e-scooter users and 116 bicycle users) involved in accidents between April 2021 and December 2023. Data were retrospectively obtained from hospital records and forensic reports of patients referred by the prosecutor's office to Eskişehir Osmangazi University. Ethical approval was secured, and all analyses were performed using SPSS version 27. RESULTS E-scooter users were significantly younger than bicycle users (mean age: 21.96 vs 30.03 years, P=0.001) and included a higher proportion of female riders (24.1% vs 12%, P=0.019). Motor vehicle collisions were more common in e-scooter accidents (68.5% vs 48.3%, P<0.001), and alcohol consumption was significantly higher among e-scooter users (18.5% vs 4.3%, P=0.006). While head injuries were more frequent among e-scooter users, fractures and dislocations were predominantly observed in bicycle users (P=0.020). CONCLUSIONS The findings from this study underscore distinct safety concerns between e-scooter and bicycle riders, emphasizing the urgent need for targeted safety interventions to mitigate the rising risk of urban e-scooter accidents.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficBicyclingWounds and InjuriesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTurkeyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39957129
PMCPMC11843780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.