Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39956989›Full record

SynthesisBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025

Genomic investigations of successful invasions: the picture emerging from recent studies.

Joanna Kołodziejczyk, Anna Fijarczyk, Ilga Porth, Piotr Robakowski, Noel Vella, Adriana Vella, Agnieszka Kloch, Aleksandra Biedrzycka

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A roadmap to key traits of invasive Drosophilidae.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rapid turnover of sex-determining architecture in invasive mussels.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. The spread of non-native species.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tracing the Invasion ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joanna KołodziejczykInstitute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Mickiewicza 33, Kraków, 31-120, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6410-3891
Anna FijarczykNatural Resources Canada, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 Rue du Peps, Québec City, Quebec, G1V 4C7, Canada.
Ilga PorthInstitute of Integrative Biology and Systems, Laval University, 1030 Avenue de La Médecine, Québec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9344-6348
Piotr RobakowskiFaculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 71E Wojska Polskiego Street, Poznań, PL 60-625, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5564-7360
Noel VellaConservation Biology Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida, MSD2080, Malta.ORCID 0000-0003-0080-5709
Adriana VellaConservation Biology Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida, MSD2080, Malta.
Agnieszka KlochFaculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1, Warsaw, 02-089, Poland.
Aleksandra BiedrzyckaInstitute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Mickiewicza 33, Kraków, 31-120, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5096-2767

Funding

European Cooperation in Science and Technology G-BiKE: CA 18134Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2020/37/B/NZ8/03801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasion biology aims to identify traits and mechanisms that contribute to successful invasions, while also providing general insights into the mechanisms underlying population expansion and adaptation to rapid climate and habitat changes. Certain phenotypic attributes have been linked to successful invasions, and the role of genetics has been critical in understanding adaptation of invasive species. Nevertheless, a comprehensive summary evaluating the most common evolutionary mechanisms associated with successful invasions across species and environments is still lacking. Here we present a systematic review of studies since 2015 that have applied genomic tools to investigate mechanisms of successful invasions across different organisms. We examine demographic patterns such as changes in genomic diversity at the population level, the presence of genetic bottlenecks and gene flow in the invasive range. We review mechanisms of adaptation such as selection from standing genetic variation and de novo mutations, hybridisation and introgression, all of which can have an impact on invasion success. This comprehensive review of recent articles on the genomic diversity of invasive species led to the creation of a searchable database to provide researchers with an accessible resource. Analysis of this database allowed quantitative assessment of demographic and adaptive mechanisms acting in invasive species. A predominant role of admixture in increasing levels of genetic diversity enabling molecular adaptation in novel habitats is the most important finding of our study. The "genetic paradox" of invasive species was not validated in genomic data across species and ecosystems. Even though the presence of genetic drift and bottlenecks is commonly reported upon invasion, a large reduction in genomic diversity is rarely observed. Any decrease in genetic diversity is often relatively mild and almost always restored via gene flow between different invasive populations. The fact that loci under selection are frequently detected suggests that adaptation to novel habitats on a molecular level is not hindered. The above findings are confirmed herein for the first time in a semi-quantitative manner by molecular data. We also point to gaps and potential improvements in the design of studies of mechanisms driving rapid molecular adaptation in invasive populations. These include the scarcity of comprehensive studies that include sampling from multiple native and invasive populations, identification of invasion sources, longitudinal population sampling, and the integration of fitness measures into genomic analyses. We also note that the potential of whole genome studies is often not exploited fully in predicting invasive potential. Comparative genomic studies identifying genome features promoting invasions are underrepresented despite their potential for use as a tool in invasive species control.

Indexed as

GenomicsIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsEcosystemGene FlowGenetic Variationadaptationadmixturebiological invasionsgenomic diversityinvasive speciesnext‐generation sequencingselection

Identifiers

PMID39956989
PMCPMC12120398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.