Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39956969›Full record

ArticleDyslexia (Chichester, England)2025

Adults With Dyslexia Use Internalised Beat Cues Less Than Controls When Estimating Interval Length.

Nathércia Lima Torres, Ana Rita Batista, José Sousa, Vasiliki Folia, Dimitris Baltos, Ana Mesquita, Susana Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathércia Lima TorresCenter for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Psychology Department, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0319-0236
Ana Rita BatistaCenter for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Psychology Department, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6433-3731
José SousaCenter for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Psychology Department, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Vasiliki FoliaLab of Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2159-7032
Dimitris BaltosLab of Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ana MesquitaCenter for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Psychology Department, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6320-281X
Susana SilvaCenter for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Psychology Department, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2240-1828

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia CPUP UIDB/00050/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/PSI-GER/5845/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Difficulties in both duration and beat-based time perception are common in individuals with dyslexia (DD). It is also known that internalised beat cues may aid in duration processing. This study investigated whether the difficulties in duration processing among DD stem from their inability to utilise internal beat cues. Participants with and without dyslexia estimated intervals ranging from 500 ms to 10 s. In the beat cue condition, participants listened to a sequence of 500 ms beats before the interval, and in the no beat cue condition, they were exposed to silence while EEG was recorded. Interestingly, the two groups did not differ in duration estimation performance, but they did differ in their utilisation of beat cues, with DD showing less sensitivity to these, whether the impact was negative (cues before shorter intervals) or positive (before longer intervals). Brainwave entrainment to the target frequency was significantly higher compared with entrainment to a non-target frequency, and cross-group differences were null. Our findings suggest that DD may have difficulties either in retaining the beat when it is no longer audible, or in using the internalised beat for duration estimation. Nevertheless, they can achieve comparable accuracy to neurotypical adults, possibly through compensatory strategies.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCuesDyslexiaTime PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultbeatdurationdyslexiainternalised beat cuesinterval estimationtime perception

Identifiers

PMID39956969
PMCPMC11830862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.