Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39956930›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2025

Preferences for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis formulations and delivery among young African women: results of a discrete choice experiment.

Wendy W Dlamini, Brenda G Mirembe, Meighan L Krows, Sue Peacock, Philip L Kotze, Pearl Selepe, Jenni Smit, Nelly Mandona, Cheryl Louw, Harriet Nuwagaba-Biribonwoha and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Wendy W DlaminiDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7923-9115
Brenda G MirembeMakerere University-Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Meighan L KrowsDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sue PeacockDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Philip L KotzeQhakaza Mbokodo Research Clinic, Ladysmith, South Africa.
Pearl SelepeAurum Klerksdorp Clinical Research Centre, Klerksdorp, South Africa.
Jenni SmitWits Maternal Adolescent and Child Health Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Nelly MandonaUniversity of North Carolina Global Projects-Kamwala Health Centre, Kamwala, Zambia.
Cheryl LouwMadibeng Centre for Research, Brits, South Africa.
Harriet Nuwagaba-BiribonwohaICAP Eswatini Prevention Center, Mbabane, Eswatini.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5131-3371
Victor O OmolloKenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Zinhle ZwaneSetshaba Research Centre, Pretoria, South Africa.
Ravindre PanchiaPerinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Soweto, South Africa.
Noluthando MwelaseUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Melissa SenneAurum Klerksdorp Clinical Research Centre, Klerksdorp, South Africa.
Logashvari NaidooSAMRC Chatsworth Clinical Research Site, Chatsworth, South Africa.
Rachel ChihanaKamuzu University of Health Sciences - Johns Hopkins Research Project, Blantyre, Malawi.
Sinead Delany-MoretlweWits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0376-1019
Katherine GillDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3372-9506
Pippa MacDonaldDesmond Tutu HIV Centre, Cape Town, South Africa.
Alastair van HeerdenCenter for Community-Based Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-6885
Shannon BosmanCenter for Community-Based Research, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Remco P H PetersFoundation for Professional Development, Research Unit, East London, South Africa.
Philip du PreezVuka Research Clinic, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Amy WardVuka Research Clinic, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Connie CelumDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8813-3419
Renee HeffronDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6039-0352
Jennifer VellozaDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-7415
INSIGHT Study Team

Funding

University of KwaZulu-Natal - CAPRISA HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069469 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI QUARRAISHA ABDOOL KARIM · 2012 to 2026
$36.4M
ICAP Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI154468 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WAFAA M. EL-SADR, JESSICA E. JUSTMAN · 2021 to 2026
$13.0M
Aurum Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI154463 · NIAID · AURUM INSTITUTE NPC · PI Gavin John Churchyard · 2021 to 2026
$8.1M
Gates Foundation INV-004743NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069469NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI154463NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI154468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective, but adherence is challenging for young women. Products centred around women's preferences could address adherence barriers. Using a longitudinal discrete choice experiment (DCE), we examined young African women's preferences around PrEP product formulation and delivery attributes before and after initiating oral PrEP.

methodsWe enrolled HIV-negative women from six African countries in a prospective cohort from August 2022 to June 2023. Women completed two DCEs on PrEP products and PrEP delivery. At enrolment and month 1, participants completed the DCE about PrEP products with 16 randomly assorted choice sets assessing product form and dosing, dose forgiveness, drug reversibility, weight change and antiretroviral or immune-based mechanism attributes. At month 3, participants completed the DCE about PrEP delivery evaluating preferences related to location to collect doses, packaging, product storage, type of HIV test and costs. Preference weights (PW) were estimated with a hierarchical Bayesian model; higher positive numbers indicate greater preference for an attribute. Importance scores compare relative importance across the five attributes; higher scores indicate greater importance.

resultsTwo thousand eight hundred and forty-seven women completed enrolment and month 1 DCEs; the median age was 24 years (range: 16-30) and 92.8% initiated daily oral PrEP. Product form and dosing was the most important attribute at enrolment and month 1. At enrolment, women preferred small oral pills taken monthly (preference weight [PW]: 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.77), and at month 1, they preferred a 6-monthly injection (PW: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.46-0.65). In the month 3 DCE, location was the most important PrEP delivery attribute with a strong preference for a youth-friendly or non-governmental organization (PW: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.19-0.30) or health facility (PW: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.17-0.25); mobile clinic or van was least preferred. The cost of the product was the second most important product delivery attribute.

conclusionsYoung African women preferred discreet, less frequently administered PrEP formulations, particularly after 1 month of taking daily oral PrEP. Long-acting formulations are needed to meet women's preferences. Coupled with the preferred PrEP delivery location and cost, the highlighted PrEP product characteristics have the potential to increase PrEP uptake.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPatient PreferencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAfricaChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMedication AdherenceProspective StudiesYoung AdultAnti-HIV Agentsdiscrete choice experimentHIV preventionlong‐actingpre‐exposure prophylaxispreferencestrade‐offs

Identifiers

PMID39956930
PMCPMC11830565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.