ArticleScandinavian journal of public health2026
Navigating financial coverage of healthcare to undocumented migrants at two hospitals in Oslo: a qualitative study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From housing to home and belonging: structural violence, ontological (in)security and women's mental health.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- Between legal rights and lived realities: Roma Women's experiences of abortion care analyzed using the WHO conceptual framework for abortion care.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study aimed to investigate how hospitals navigate financial coverage of healthcare for undocumented migrants, given the present laws and regulations in Norway.
methodsThis qualitative study used an explorative approach. We collected and studied hospital guidelines for registering and invoicing foreign patients, and interviewed hospital staff from two university hospitals, and undocumented migrants at one non-governmental clinic in Oslo. The first author collected 14 documents and conducted 14 semi-structured, in-depth interviews. The project team used a thematic-analysis-inspired approach to identify patterns of shared meaning in the guidelines and interviews.
resultsWe found that the hospital guidelines did not account for undocumented migrants. The staff had to navigate between the guidelines and practical implications of undocumented migrant patients not having a resident permit and thus lacking a Norwegian identity number, bank card, or address. We found discrepancies between different staff's expected roles in the registration of patients and in the assessment of patients' ability to pay. The guidelines presumed an active patient and required documentation, which undocumented migrants had difficulty meeting.
conclusionsThe underlying assumption of patients being documented in routines led to a process of othering of undocumented patients and thereby reproducing their marginalised position in the health system, hence depriving them of the right to 'health care that is absolutely necessary and cannot wait'. We recommend that hospitals increase staff's knowledge and capacity to ensure undocumented migrants' right to healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.