Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39956870›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning-based identification of co-expressed genes in prostate cancer and CRPC and construction of prognostic models.

Changhui Fan, Zhiheng Huang, Han Xu, Tianhe Zhang, Haiyang Wei, Junfeng Gao, Changbao Xu, Changhui Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Spotlight onGenes · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Changhui FanSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhiheng HuangSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. 1011702103@qq.com.
Han XuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Tianhe ZhangSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Haiyang WeiSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Junfeng GaoSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Changbao XuSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Changhui FanSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to employ machine learning to identify shared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in prostate cancer (PCa) initiation and castration resistance, aiming to establish a robust prognostic model and enhance understanding of patient prognosis for personalized treatment strategies. mRNA transcriptome data associated with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) were obtained from the GEO database. Differential expression analysis was conducted using the limma R package to compare normal prostate samples with PCa samples, and PCa samples with CRPC samples. Next, we applied LASSO regression, univariate, and multivariate COX regression analyses to pinpoint genes linked to prognosis and build prognostic models. Validation was performed using the TCGA_PRAD dataset to confirm expression differences of hub genes and explore their correlation with clinical variables and prognostic significance. We successfully established a prostate cancer risk prognostic model containing seven genes (KIF4A, UBE2C, FAM72D, CCDC78, HOXD9, LIX1 and SLC5A8) and verified its accuracy on an independent data set. The results of calibration curve and decision curve show that the model has potential clinical application value. The nomogram can accurately predict the prognosis of patients. Additionally, elevated expression of KIF4A, UBE2C, and FAM72D, or reduced expression of LIX1, correlated with advanced pathological T and N stages, clinical T stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, age at diagnosis, Gleason score, and shorter progression-free interval (PFI) (P < 0.05). By integrating bioinformatics analysis and clinical data, we not only established a reliable prognostic model for prostate cancer but also identified key genes pivotal in disease progression and treatment resistance. These findings provide novel insights and methodologies for assessing prognosis and tailoring treatment strategies for prostate cancer patients.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticMachine LearningProstatic NeoplasmsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantBiomarkers, TumorGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleNomogramsPrognosisTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorCastration resistanceDifferentially expressed genesPrognostic modelingProstate cancerTCGA

Identifiers

PMID39956870
PMCPMC11830771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.