Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39956865›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2025

Advanced Endoscopy: Future Training Perspectives and Tracks.

Zubair Khan, Kambiz Kadkhodayan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zubair KhanMercy Clinic, Festus, MO, USA.
Kambiz KadkhodayanCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Altamonte Springs, FL, USA. kambiz.kadkhodayan.md@adventhealth.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSince the introduction of ERCP and EUS in the 1980s, the field of advanced endoscopy has witnessed significant growth, necessitating formalized fellowship training to ensure competency and patient safety. This article reviews the history and development of Advanced Endoscopy Fellowship (AEF) training in North America, outlining current challenges such as variability in training standards, case volume, and faculty expertise. RECENT

findingsGeneral gastroenterology fellowships with apprenticeship model training in advanced endoscopic procedures have been insufficient, prompting the establishment of Advanced Endoscopy Fellowship (AEF) programs across North America. There are emerging trends in interventional endoscopy training, such as competency-based education (CBE), simulation-based training (SBT), and video-based training (VBT). There are new pathways for specialized modular and robotic training and non-traditional routes for EUS and ERCP skill acquisition. Variability across AEF programs remains concerning. This highlights the need for expanded regulatory efforts by organizations like ASGE. Advanced endoscopy training continues to evolve with innovative educational models. However, addressing variability, resource constraints, and employment challenges will be essential to meet the expanding procedural demands of this field and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGastroenterologyClinical CompetenceCompetency-Based EducationFellowships and ScholarshipsHumansSimulation TrainingAdvanced endoscopy fellowshipAdvanced endoscopy trainingInterventional endoscopy training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.